Claim being evaluated

Is safe for human administration

A claim to investigate, not an established benefit. Each outcome below is assessed separately.

What the evidence suggests

Adverse events, serious adverse events and discontinuations: The certainty of evidence about the safety of thymosin beta-4 in people is very low. Small, short trials of the injected form and of eye drops or skin application reported mostly mild or moderate side effects and no serious ones. However, these were given only as brief summaries without comparing treated and placebo groups. This does not show that thymosin beta-4 is safe; it means rare, delayed or longer-term harms have not been properly studied.

What remains unknown: It is unknown how adverse event rates compare between thymosin beta-4 and placebo, because no arm-level counts were reported. Discontinuation rates are unknown. Safety beyond a few weeks to months of follow-up has not been studied, nor has repeated or long-term use. Effects in patients with serious illness, older adults, pregnant people and children are unknown, as is immunogenicity (anti-drug antibody results were not reported). Results of two registered trials, one terminated, are unavailable. Safety of non-pharmaceutical products is also unknown.

Version 1 · published November 8, 2026 · evidence through November 8, 2026 · research snapshot 2026.1.1 · methodology ev-1 · Automated by rule (no eligible human study was found), not reviewed by a person.

Certainty by outcome

Adverse events, serious adverse events and discontinuations

Insufficient information to assess

Safety outcome · 8 studies · 318 participants

Not enough evidence to tell

The certainty of evidence about the safety of thymosin beta-4 in people is very low. Small, short trials of the injected form and of eye drops or skin application reported mostly mild or moderate side effects and no serious ones. However, these were given only as brief summaries without comparing treated and placebo groups. This does not show that thymosin beta-4 is safe; it means rare, delayed or longer-term harms have not been properly studied.

What the research measured: Adverse events, serious adverse events and dose-limiting toxicities were reported narratively. In two intravenous phase I trials in healthy volunteers (four cohorts of 10; 54 single-dose plus 30 multiple-dose subjects), adverse events were mild or moderate and no dose-limiting toxicities or serious adverse events occurred, but results were not given by arm. A topical venous ulcer trial (73 randomized) reported a safety profile comparable to placebo. A dry eye trial (72 randomized) reported no adverse events observed. A 9-patient severe dry eye trial and a 10-patient cell-therapy pilot described the treatment only as safe or well tolerated, with no counts. Two registered trials (12 and 18 enrolled) reported no safety data. Discontinuations were not reported in any study.

What remains unknown: It is unknown how adverse event rates compare between thymosin beta-4 and placebo, because no arm-level counts were reported. Discontinuation rates are unknown. Safety beyond a few weeks to months of follow-up has not been studied, nor has repeated or long-term use. Effects in patients with serious illness, older adults, pregnant people and children are unknown, as is immunogenicity (anti-drug antibody results were not reported). Results of two registered trials, one terminated, are unavailable. Safety of non-pharmaceutical products is also unknown.

Reviewers’ note: At least one included study has no risk-of-bias assessment, so no certainty rating is given.

How the certainty was judged
GRADE domain judgments
DomainJudgmentWhy
Starting level—
Risk of bias—All contributing trials are available only as abstracts or registry entries. Risk-of-bias judgments for the safety outcomes range from some concerns to high. Randomization, blinding and allocation details cannot be verified, and adverse events are mostly described narratively without arm-level breakdown.
Inconsistency—The trials with any safety reporting all describe adverse events as absent, mild to moderate, or comparable to placebo, with no serious adverse events reported. There is no apparent disagreement, although narrative reporting limits formal assessment.
Indirectness—Healthy volunteers and several different conditions were studied by IV, topical skin and eye routes. One study used Tβ4-primed cells, not Tβ4 itself. Discontinuations were not reported by any study.
Imprecision—No study reported adverse event counts by arm or any effect estimate for active versus placebo. Total contributing samples are small, around 300 people across short phase I/II trials. That is far too few to detect uncommon or delayed harms, and zero serious events in such samples is uninformative.
Publication bias—Two registered placebo-controlled safety trials have no available results in the record; one was terminated early. Most other trials are small, likely commercially sponsored phase I/II studies (e.g., RGN-259) reported only in abstracts, with funding not stated.

Included studies

Version 1 · published November 8, 2026 · evidence through November 8, 2026 · research snapshot 2026.1.1 · methodology ev-1 · GRADE (handbook, 2013) · Automated assessment by AI (claude-opus-5-5 and claude-sonnet-5-5), not reviewed by a person.

The questions and the studies screened

Population, intervention, comparator and outcome (PICO), and why each study was or wasn’t eligible.

Population: Any human population studied · Intervention: Thymosin beta-4 (any formulation studied) · Comparator: Placebo, vehicle or none · Outcome: Adverse events, serious adverse events and discontinuations

  • PLS-00126: not eligible (not primary study)
  • PLS-00127: not eligible (not primary study)
  • PLS-00128: not eligible (not primary study)
  • PLS-00129: not eligible (not primary study)
  • PLS-00130: not eligible (not primary study)
  • PLS-00131: not eligible (not primary study)
  • PLS-00132: not eligible (not human)
  • PLS-00133: not eligible (not primary study)
  • PLS-00134: not eligible (insufficient data)
  • PLS-00135: not eligible (not primary study)
  • PLS-00136: not eligible (not primary study)
  • PLS-00137: not eligible (not primary study)
  • PLS-00138: not eligible (not primary study)
  • PLS-00139: not eligible (not primary study)
  • PLS-00140: not eligible (not primary study)
  • PLS-00141: not eligible (not primary study)
  • PLS-00142: not eligible (not primary study)
  • PLS-00143: not eligible (insufficient data)
  • PLS-00144: not eligible (not primary study)
  • PLS-00145: not eligible (not primary study)
  • PLS-00146: not eligible (not primary study)
  • PLS-00147: not eligible (not primary study)
  • PLS-00148: not eligible (not primary study)
  • PLS-00149: eligible · direct evidence: Humans received Tβ4 intravenously versus placebo with adverse events, serious adverse events and dose-limiting toxicity reported, matching the safety question. Discontinuations were not reported.
  • PLS-00150: not eligible (not primary study)
  • PLS-00151: not eligible (not primary study)
  • PLS-00152: not eligible (not primary study)
  • PLS-00153: not eligible (not primary study)
  • PLS-00154: not eligible (not primary study)
  • PLS-00155: not eligible (insufficient data)
  • PLS-00156: eligible · direct evidence: Randomized placebo-controlled trial in humans that reports the safety profile of topical Tβ4 as acceptable and comparable to placebo.
  • PLS-00157: not eligible (not primary study)
  • PLS-00158: not eligible (not primary study)
  • PLS-00159: not eligible (not primary study)
  • PLS-00160: not eligible (not primary study)
  • PLS-00161: not eligible (not primary study)
  • PLS-00162: not eligible (not primary study)
  • PLS-00163: not eligible (not primary study)
  • PLS-00164: not eligible (not primary study)
  • PLS-00165: not eligible (not primary study)
  • PLS-00166: not eligible (not primary study)
  • PLS-00167: eligible · indirect evidence (differs on intervention, comparator, outcome): Humans received Tβ4-pretreated cells versus untreated cells, so Tβ4 exposure was only ex vivo priming. Safety is reported only as a narrative 'appeared safe' statement, with no adverse event counts.
  • PLS-00168: not eligible (not primary study)
  • PLS-00169: not eligible (not primary study)
  • PLS-00170: not eligible (not primary study)
  • PLS-00171: not eligible (not primary study)
  • PLS-00172: not eligible (not primary study)
  • PLS-00173: eligible · direct evidence: A human placebo-controlled trial of thymosin beta-4 that reports adverse events, serious adverse events and dose-limiting toxicities; discontinuations are not reported.
  • PLS-00174: eligible · direct evidence: Placebo-controlled trial in humans that reports adverse events (none observed) over a 28-day course of topical Tβ4. Discontinuations are not reported.
  • PLS-00175: not eligible (not primary study)
  • PLS-00176: not eligible (not primary study)
  • PLS-00177: not eligible (not primary study)
  • PLS-00178: not eligible (insufficient data)
  • PLS-00179: not eligible (not primary study)
  • PLS-00180: not eligible (not primary study)
  • PLS-00181: not eligible (not primary study)
  • PLS-00182: not eligible (not primary study)
  • PLS-00183: not eligible (not primary study)
  • PLS-00184: not eligible (not primary study)
  • PLS-00185: not eligible (not primary study)
  • PLS-00186: not eligible (not primary study)
  • PLS-00187: not eligible (not primary study)
  • PLS-00188: not eligible (not primary study)
  • PLS-00189: not eligible (not primary study)
  • PLS-00190: not eligible (not primary study)
  • PLS-00191: not eligible (not primary study)
  • PLS-00192: not eligible (not primary study)
  • PLS-00193: not eligible (not primary study)
  • PLS-00194: not eligible (not primary study)
  • PLS-00195: not eligible (not primary study)
  • PLS-00196: not eligible (not primary study)
  • PLS-00197: not eligible (not primary study)
  • PLS-00198: not eligible (not primary study)
  • PLS-00199: not eligible (not primary study)
  • PLS-00200: not eligible (not primary study)
  • PLS-00201: eligible · direct evidence: Humans received thymosin beta-4 eye drops vs vehicle and safety was evaluated. However, only a narrative 'safe and well tolerated' statement is given, without adverse event or discontinuation counts.
  • PLS-00202: not eligible (not primary study)
  • PLS-00203: not eligible (not primary study)
  • PLS-00204: not eligible (not primary study)
  • PLS-00205: not eligible (not primary study)
  • PLS-00206: not eligible (not primary study)
  • PLS-00208: not eligible (insufficient data)
  • PLS-00209: not eligible (insufficient data)
  • PLS-00210: eligible · direct evidence: A human study of thymosin beta 4 eye drops against placebo whose title says it assessed safety. However, the record gives no adverse event data, so it contributes no extractable safety results.
  • PLS-00211: not eligible (not primary study)
  • PLS-00212: not eligible (insufficient data)
  • PLS-00214: not eligible (not primary study)
  • PLS-00215: not eligible (insufficient data)
  • PLS-00225: not eligible (insufficient data)
  • PLS-00226: eligible · indirect evidence (differs on outcome): This placebo/vehicle-controlled study of Tβ4 eye drops is titled as a safety assessment. However, no adverse event, serious adverse event or discontinuation data appear in the record.
  • PLS-00235: not eligible (insufficient data)
  • PLS-00237: not eligible (insufficient data)
  • PLS-00238: not eligible (insufficient data)
  • PLS-00239: not eligible (insufficient data)
  • PLS-00243: not eligible (insufficient data)
  • PLS-00251: not eligible (insufficient data)

Version history

  • Version 1 · published November 8, 2026 · evidence through November 8, 2026 · research snapshot 2026.1.1 · methodology ev-1 · Automated by rule (no eligible human study was found), not reviewed by a person.

How claims are assessed

These assessments describe published research. Records marked automated were produced by AI under the published methodology and have not been reviewed by a person; they can contain errors. None of this is medical advice, not a statement about any product’s safety for human use, and not a regulatory approval. Peptide Library’s vendor and partner relationships play no part in them (editorial independence).