Human study PLS-00208
A Phase 2 Study on Effect of Thymosin Beta 4 on Wound Healing in Patients With Epidermolysis Bullosa
Version 1 · published November 8, 2026 · evidence through November 8, 2026 · research snapshot 2026.1.1 · methodology ev-1 · Automated assessment by AI (claude-opus-5-5 and claude-sonnet-5-5), not reviewed by a person.
Reports of this study
Every publication, registration and abstract describing this one study. Participants are counted once.
- A Phase 2 Study on Effect of Thymosin Beta 4 on Wound Healing in Patients With Epidermolysis Bullosaregistry entry · NCT00311766 (TERMINATED, results posted, planned enrollment 30)
Design and participants
- Design
- Other design
- Population
- Patients with epidermolysis bullosa (wound healing study); age and other eligibility details not stated in the record
- Conditions
- Epidermolysis Bullosa
- Setting
- not stated
- Planned enrollment (registry)
- 30
- Enrolled
- 30
- Randomized
- Not reported
- Completed follow-up
- Not reported
- Funding
- not stated
- Authors’ conflicts
- not stated
Intervention and comparator
What each group received. Related peptides, analogs and combinations are never treated as the compound itself.
- Thymosin Beta 4 (intervention) · thymosin-beta-4 · Thymosin beta 4, as listed in the registry interventions; formulation not stated · Not reported assigned
- Placebo (comparator) · Placebo, as listed in the registry interventions · placebo · Not reported assigned
What the authors reported
As stated in the sources. This is the authors’ account, not Peptide Library’s assessment.
Wound healing
unclear outcome · patient-important · Not stated in the record; only the study title indicates wound healing is the focus
- No results reported.
Adverse events
None reported. That is not evidence of safety.
Monitoring: not stated
Peptide Library’s assessment
An automated assessment, made by AI separately from the authors’ conclusions and not reviewed by a person. How risk of bias is assessed.
Limitations
- abstract only: Only the registry entry is available; no publication, abstract or results data are included in the record.
- incomplete follow up: The registry status is TERMINATED, so the study ended early and planned follow-up may not have been completed.
- small or imprecise: Actual enrollment was only 30 participants across the thymosin beta 4 and placebo groups, limiting precision.
- other: Randomization and blinding methods are not stated in the record despite the placebo comparator, so the design cannot be confirmed as an RCT.
- selective reporting: The registry indicates results exist, but no outcome or adverse event results are present in the record to appraise.
No risk-of-bias assessment has been published for this study’s results.
Claims this study informs
- Improves dry eye signs and symptoms: not eligible (wrong population) for “Ocular discomfort and corneal staining”
- Is safe for human administration: not eligible (insufficient data) for “Adverse events, serious adverse events and discontinuations”
Where each value comes from
- arms: NCT NCT00311766, registry (interventions field) · extracted by AI (automated, not verified by a person)
- design: NCT NCT00311766, registry (study_type and phases fields) · extracted by AI (automated, not verified by a person)
- limitations: NCT NCT00311766, registry (status and has_results fields) · extracted by AI (automated, not verified by a person)
- outcomes: NCT NCT00311766, title (study title) · extracted by AI (automated, not verified by a person)
- participants: NCT NCT00311766, registry (enrollment and enrollment_type fields) · extracted by AI (automated, not verified by a person)
- population: NCT NCT00311766, registry (conditions field) · extracted by AI (automated, not verified by a person)
Version 1 · published November 8, 2026 · evidence through November 8, 2026 · research snapshot 2026.1.1 · methodology ev-1 · Automated assessment by AI (claude-opus-5-5 and claude-sonnet-5-5), not reviewed by a person.
These assessments describe published research. Records marked automated were produced by AI under the published methodology and have not been reviewed by a person; they can contain errors. None of this is medical advice, not a statement about any product’s safety for human use, and not a regulatory approval. Peptide Library’s vendor and partner relationships play no part in them (editorial independence).