Human study PLS-00140
Thymosin β4, a potential marker of malignancy and prognosis in hepatocellular carcinoma.
Version 1 · published November 8, 2026 · evidence through November 8, 2026 · research snapshot 2026.1.1 · methodology ev-1 · Automated assessment by AI (claude-opus-5-5 and claude-sonnet-5-5), not reviewed by a person.
Only the abstract was available. Essential methods may be missing, which limits what can be judged.
Reports of this study
Every publication, registration and abstract describing this one study. Participants are counted once.
- Thymosin β4, a potential marker of malignancy and prognosis in hepatocellular carcinoma.primary · Scandinavian journal of gastroenterology · 2022-10-21 · PMID 36269095 · DOI
Design and participants
- Design
- Case-control study
- Population
- Adults with hepatocellular carcinoma, liver cirrhosis or hepatitis, and healthy volunteers, enrolled to evaluate serum thymosin β4 as a biomarker.
- Conditions
- Hepatocellular carcinoma, Liver cirrhosis, Hepatitis
- Setting
- not_stated
- Planned enrollment (registry)
- Not reported
- Enrolled
- 540
- Randomized
- Not reported
- Completed follow-up
- Not reported
- Funding
- not_stated
- Authors’ conflicts
- not_stated
Intervention and comparator
What each group received. Related peptides, analogs and combinations are never treated as the compound itself.
What the authors reported
As stated in the sources. This is the authors’ account, not Peptide Library’s assessment.
Adverse events
None reported. That is not evidence of safety.
Monitoring: not_stated
The authors concluded (paraphrased): The authors concluded that serum thymosin β4 may serve as a novel biomarker for diagnosing hepatocellular carcinoma and predicting its prognosis.
Peptide Library’s assessment
An automated assessment, made by AI separately from the authors’ conclusions and not reviewed by a person. How risk of bias is assessed.
Limitations
- inappropriate endpoint: Thymosin β4 is measured as an endogenous biomarker rather than given as a treatment, so no effect of administering the compound can be inferred.
- abstract only: Only the PubMed abstract is available, and part of the results text appears truncated, which limits the appraisal.
- inappropriate population: The study measured endogenous Tβ4 as a diagnostic marker and did not administer the compound, so it does not inform treatment effects or safety.
No risk-of-bias assessment has been published for this study’s results.
Claims this study informs
- Improves dry eye signs and symptoms: not eligible (not primary study) for “Ocular discomfort and corneal staining”
- Is safe for human administration: not eligible (not primary study) for “Adverse events, serious adverse events and discontinuations”
Where each value comes from
- author_conclusion: PMID 36269095, abstract (Conclusion, sentence 1) · extracted by AI (automated, not verified by a person) · abstract only
- design: PMID 36269095, abstract (Patients and methods, sentences 1-3) · extracted by AI (automated, not verified by a person) · abstract only
- limitations: PMID 36269095, abstract (Results, sentences 1-6) · extracted by AI (automated, not verified by a person) · abstract only
- participants: PMID 36269095, abstract (Patients and methods, sentence 1) · extracted by AI (automated, not verified by a person) · abstract only
- population: PMID 36269095, abstract (Patients and methods, sentence 1) · extracted by AI (automated, not verified by a person) · abstract only
Version 1 · published November 8, 2026 · evidence through November 8, 2026 · research snapshot 2026.1.1 · methodology ev-1 · Automated assessment by AI (claude-opus-5-5 and claude-sonnet-5-5), not reviewed by a person.
These assessments describe published research. Records marked automated were produced by AI under the published methodology and have not been reviewed by a person; they can contain errors. None of this is medical advice, not a statement about any product’s safety for human use, and not a regulatory approval. Peptide Library’s vendor and partner relationships play no part in them (editorial independence).