Human study PLS-00186
Evaluation of thymosin β4 in the regulation of epithelial-mesenchymal transformation in urothelial carcinoma.
Version 1 · published November 8, 2026 · evidence through November 8, 2026 · research snapshot 2026.1.1 · methodology ev-1 · Automated assessment by AI (claude-opus-5-5 and claude-sonnet-5-5), not reviewed by a person.
Only the abstract was available. Essential methods may be missing, which limits what can be judged.
Reports of this study
Every publication, registration and abstract describing this one study. Participants are counted once.
- Evaluation of thymosin β4 in the regulation of epithelial-mesenchymal transformation in urothelial carcinoma.primary · Urologic oncology · 2010-09-22 · PMID 20864366 · DOI
Design and participants
- Design
- Other design
- Population
- Tissue samples from clinical patients (normal bladder, urothelial carcinoma pTa and pT3, paracancerous tissue) plus two bladder cancer cell lines
- Conditions
- Urothelial (transitional cell) carcinoma of the bladder
- Setting
- Union Hospital of Tongji Medical College (China)
- Planned enrollment (registry)
- Not reported
- Enrolled
- Not reported
- Randomized
- Not reported
- Completed follow-up
- Not reported
- Funding
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't (publication type). No funder is named.
Intervention and comparator
What each group received. Related peptides, analogs and combinations are never treated as the compound itself.
What the authors reported
As stated in the sources. This is the authors’ account, not Peptide Library’s assessment.
Adverse events
None reported. That is not evidence of safety, and how safety was monitored isn’t described.
The authors concluded (paraphrased): Tβ4 likely plays a crucial role in EMT progression in bladder cancer. Inhibiting its expression, or its interactions with other genes, may be a novel therapeutic target for highly invasive and metastatic bladder cancers.
Peptide Library’s assessment
An automated assessment, made by AI separately from the authors’ conclusions and not reviewed by a person. How risk of bias is assessed.
Limitations
- other: Mechanistic tissue-expression and cell-line work in which no person received thymosin β4, so it gives no clinical evidence on administration.
- abstract only: Only the abstract is available. Sample sizes per group and quantitative results are not reported.
- inappropriate population: Study examined endogenous Tβ4 expression in bladder tumour tissue and cell lines. No participants received Tβ4 and no clinical outcomes were measured.
No risk-of-bias assessment has been published for this study’s results.
Claims this study informs
- Improves dry eye signs and symptoms: not eligible (not primary study) for “Ocular discomfort and corneal staining”
- Is safe for human administration: not eligible (not primary study) for “Adverse events, serious adverse events and discontinuations”
Where each value comes from
- author_conclusion: PMID 20864366, abstract (Conclusions, sentence 1) · extracted by AI (automated, not verified by a person) · abstract only
- design: PMID 20864366, abstract (Materials and methods, sentences 1-4) · extracted by AI (automated, not verified by a person) · abstract only
- funding: PMID 20864366, abstract (publication types) · extracted by AI (automated, not verified by a person) · abstract only
- population: PMID 20864366, abstract (Materials and methods, sentences 1-2) · extracted by AI (automated, not verified by a person) · abstract only
Version 1 · published November 8, 2026 · evidence through November 8, 2026 · research snapshot 2026.1.1 · methodology ev-1 · Automated assessment by AI (claude-opus-5-5 and claude-sonnet-5-5), not reviewed by a person.
These assessments describe published research. Records marked automated were produced by AI under the published methodology and have not been reviewed by a person; they can contain errors. None of this is medical advice, not a statement about any product’s safety for human use, and not a regulatory approval. Peptide Library’s vendor and partner relationships play no part in them (editorial independence).