Peptide Guides
CJC-1295 and Ipamorelin: Why the Pairing Exists and What the Vial Math Looks Like
These two are combined because they act on different receptors, not the same one harder. The detail that changes everything — and that most listings bury — is whether the CJC-1295 has DAC.
Peptide Library Editorial · July 14, 2026 · Updated August 30, 2026 · 3 min read

CJC-1295 and ipamorelin are paired because they act on two different receptors. CJC-1295 is a GHRH analogue working through the GHRH receptor; ipamorelin works through the ghrelin receptor. The rationale is complementary stimulation, not more of the same signal.
One detail decides almost everything about how a blend behaves, and most product listings mention it only in passing: whether the CJC-1295 includes DAC.
Neither is an approved drug. Both are sold for laboratory research only, with no approved human indication or established dose. Nothing here is dosing guidance.
The DAC distinction
DAC stands for Drug Affinity Complex — a modification that binds the peptide to albumin in the bloodstream, dramatically extending how long it circulates.
CJC-1295 with DAC | CJC-1295 without DAC (Mod GRF 1-29) | |
|---|---|---|
Half-life | Roughly 6–8 days | About 30 minutes |
Effect on GH | Sustained elevation ("bleed") | Sharp, short pulse |
Typical cadence discussed | Once or twice weekly | Multiple times daily |
Pairs with ipamorelin | Poorly — timing mismatch | Well — both act in a short window |
This is the thing to check before anything else. Ipamorelin acts over minutes. Pairing it with a version of CJC-1295 that circulates for a week produces a fundamentally different profile from pairing it with the 30-minute version. A listing that just says "CJC-1295" without specifying is incomplete — and "blend" listings most often contain the no-DAC form.
Blends sold for research overwhelmingly use the no-DAC form precisely because the short half-life matches ipamorelin's. If a vendor cannot tell you which one you are buying, that is information about the vendor.
Why the pairing is proposed
The two receptors sit on different pathways into the same output. CJC-1295 increases the amplitude of GH pulses through the GHRH pathway; ipamorelin prompts release through the ghrelin pathway while — per the research on its selectivity — avoiding the cortisol and prolactin rises of older secretagogues.
The mechanistic rationale is coherent. What does not exist is a controlled human trial showing the combination outperforms either component alone, and that gap should be stated plainly rather than glossed over.
Blend vial math
Blends are usually labelled as a combined total, which creates the same ambiguity as any blended vial: is a "10 mg blend" 5 mg of each, or 10 mg of each? Resolve that before adding water.
A 2 mg CJC-1295 + 5 mg ipamorelin vial
BAC water | CJC conc. | IPA conc. | 100 mcg CJC | 200 mcg IPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
2 mL | 1 mg/mL | 2.5 mg/mL | 10 units | 8 units |
3 mL | 0.67 mg/mL | 1.67 mg/mL | 15 units | 12 units |
5 mL | 0.4 mg/mL | 1 mg/mL | 25 units | 20 units |
The constraint of any blend applies here too: a single draw delivers both in a fixed ratio, set by the vendor rather than by you. Separate vials cost more but allow each component to vary independently. The peptide calculator supports per-component concentrations for blend vials, and the BPC-157 and TB-500 guide works through the same labelling trap in more detail.
Frequently asked questions
Is Mod GRF 1-29 the same as CJC-1295 without DAC?
Yes — the names are used interchangeably for the same modified GHRH fragment. Listings may use either.
Why do half-life figures differ so much between sources?
Because the two forms are constantly conflated. A source quoting days is describing the DAC version; one quoting minutes is describing the no-DAC version. Both can be correct about different molecules.
Does the blend need refrigeration?
Once reconstituted, yes — 2–8 °C, never frozen, bounded by the shorter of peptide stability and the 28-day bacteriostatic water limit. See the bacteriostatic water guide.
Research and educational use only. Peptide Library is an independent research and comparison platform and does not sell peptides. Nothing here is medical advice, dosing guidance, or a recommendation to administer any substance to a person or an animal. Consult a licensed clinician for anything concerning human health.
Sources
Author
Peptide Library Editorial
Editorial content from Peptide Library. Research and educational use only. Not medical advice.
Related articles
Related peptides
Related tools
Research smarter with Peptide Library.
Compare peptides, review vendor data, and use research calculators in one place.
Explore the LibraryResearch and educational use only. Not medical advice. Peptide Library does not sell peptides.