Human evidence quality
TB-500 (Thymosin Beta-4 fragment): what the human research shows
Evidence overview
Research volume and reviewed human evidence are different numbers, kept apart.
Indexed publications
20
Research snapshot 2026.1.1
Human clinical publications
0
PubMed records classified as human research
Distinct human studies reviewed
1
of 1 identified
Randomized controlled studies
0
among reviewed studies
Studies with reported results
0
Registered, no results available
1
Unpublished is not negative
Study results assessed for risk of bias
0
Outcomes with a certainty assessment
2
Research volume for TB-500 (Thymosin Beta-4 fragment) · Library profile
Claims evaluated
Claims are things to investigate, never established benefits. Evidence for one outcome doesn’t carry over to another.
| Claim being evaluated | Eligible human studies | Certainty by outcome |
|---|---|---|
| Supports soft-tissue injury recovery | 0 |
|
| Is safe for human administrationSafety | 0 |
|
Human studies
Each distinct study once, however many papers, abstracts or registrations describe it.
TB-500 (Thymosin Beta 4 17-23 Fragment) for Cardiovascular Biomarkers in Stable ASCVDOther design · Not reported participants · first reported 2026 · automated, not human-reviewed
Population: Adults with stable atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and endothelial dysfunction, per the registered conditions; eligibility details are not in the record.
Full study record (PLS-00248)Why the counts differ
Publications, studies and registrations are different units.
These numbers count different things. The research snapshot 2026.1.1 counts 0 human clinical publications: PubMed records, classified by publication type. Here, each reviewed study is counted once (1 in all), however many reports describe it (0 PubMed records, 1 registration, 0 other reports such as meeting abstracts outside PubMed).
| Study | Source record | Role |
|---|---|---|
| PLS-00248 | NCT07487363 · no results postedTB-500 (Thymosin Beta 4 17-23 Fragment) for Cardiovascular Biomarkers in Stable ASCVD | registry entry |
Evidence gaps
Research activity gap: No gap identified
Little indexed research of any kind.
Human research gap: Gap identified
Laboratory or animal research exists, but little human research.
Evidence quality gap: Gap identified
Human research exists, but no assessed outcome reaches moderate or high certainty.
Clinical relevance gap: Gap identified
Studies exist but none directly address a claim being evaluated.
Safety evidence gap: Gap identified
Safety is not established with moderate or high certainty for the populations, routes or durations studied.
Timeline
Registrations, publications, posted results and every change to the assessments.
2026-03-23
Registered: NCT07487363
2026-11-08
Claim assessment published (version 1)
2026-11-08
Claim assessment published (version 1)
2026-11-08
Certainty assessment published (version 1)
2026-11-08
Certainty assessment published (version 1)
2026-11-08
Study record published (version 1)
Sources and method
Every assessment links its sources and keeps its full version history. Methodology · All assessments (CSV) · All study records (CSV)
These assessments describe published research. Records marked automated were produced by AI under the published methodology and have not been reviewed by a person; they can contain errors. None of this is medical advice, not a statement about any product’s safety for human use, and not a regulatory approval. Peptide Library’s vendor and partner relationships play no part in them (editorial independence).