Claim being evaluated

Improves exercise capacity in primary mitochondrial myopathy

A claim to investigate, not an established benefit. Each outcome below is assessed separately.

What the evidence suggests

Six-minute walk distance and fatigue: The certainty of the evidence is low, so the true effect may differ substantially from what these studies suggest. The largest and longest trial found that elamipretide did not improve walking distance or fatigue compared with placebo in adults with primary mitochondrial myopathy. Two small, short trials and later subgroup analyses hinted at benefit, but these results are less reliable. Whether elamipretide helps people with specific genetic forms of the disease is still being tested.

What remains unknown: Whether benefit exists in specific genotypes, such as mtDNA replisome disorders, needs confirmation in prospectively designed trials. Effects beyond 24 weeks are unknown. Full trial reports with arm sizes, attrition and multiplicity handling are not available. Safety data are only narrative, and no reported serious events in small short trials does not establish long-term safety.

Version 1 · published November 8, 2026 · evidence through November 8, 2026 · research snapshot 2026.1.1 · methodology ev-1 · Automated by rule (no eligible human study was found), not reviewed by a person.

Certainty by outcome

Six-minute walk distance and fatigue

Low certainty

Patient-important outcome · 4 studies · 284 participants

The evidence conflicts

The certainty of the evidence is low, so the true effect may differ substantially from what these studies suggest. The largest and longest trial found that elamipretide did not improve walking distance or fatigue compared with placebo in adults with primary mitochondrial myopathy. Two small, short trials and later subgroup analyses hinted at benefit, but these results are less reliable. Whether elamipretide helps people with specific genetic forms of the disease is still being tested.

What the research measured: 6MWT findings differed by trial. In MMPOWER-3 (218 randomized, 24 weeks), the between-group difference in 6MWT change was -3.2 m (95% CI -18.7 to 12.3; p=0.69) and in PMMSA total fatigue -0.07 (95% CI -0.1 to 0.26; p=0.37), both not significant. In a 30-participant 4-week crossover trial, the 6MWT difference was 19.8 m favoring elamipretide (95% CI -2.8 to 42.5; p=0.0833), with nominally significant reductions in PMMSA fatigue (p=0.0006) and Neuro-QoL fatigue (p=0.0115). In a 36-participant 5-day dose-escalation trial, the top dose group changed 64.5 m vs 20.4 m with placebo (p=0.053), with a dose-dependent trend (p=0.014). Post hoc MMPOWER-3 subgroups (mtDNA replisome, CPEO) suggested benefit only in genotype-restricted subsets.

What remains unknown: Whether benefit exists in specific genotypes, such as mtDNA replisome disorders, needs confirmation in prospectively designed trials. Effects beyond 24 weeks are unknown. Full trial reports with arm sizes, attrition and multiplicity handling are not available. Safety data are only narrative, and no reported serious events in small short trials does not establish long-term safety.

Reviewers’ note: Starting at high for randomized evidence, the rating was lowered one level for risk of bias and one level for inconsistency, giving low certainty. The post hoc MMPOWER-3 analysis reuses participants from the main trial and was not counted as independent evidence.

How the certainty was judged
GRADE domain judgments
DomainJudgmentWhy
Starting levelHigh (randomized evidence)
Risk of biasSerious (rated down one level)All four records are available only as abstracts, so allocation, blinding, attrition and analysis populations cannot be checked. RoB2 judgments are some concerns for the main MMPOWER-3 outcomes and high for the dose-escalation 6MWT result and the post hoc genotype subgroups. In the crossover trial, frequent injection site reactions could have unblinded participants for self-reported fatigue.
InconsistencySerious (rated down one level)The largest and longest trial (MMPOWER-3, 24 weeks) found no difference in 6MWT distance or fatigue. The smaller, shorter trials reported favorable 6MWT trends and nominally significant fatigue reductions. The positive post hoc findings are confined to genotype subsets defined after the primary endpoint failed.
IndirectnessNot seriousAll trials enrolled adults with genetically confirmed primary mitochondrial myopathy, compared elamipretide with placebo, and measured 6MWT and fatigue directly. The small trials' very short treatment periods (5 days, 4 weeks) limit their relevance to sustained benefit, but the main trial ran 24 weeks.
ImprecisionNot seriousThe pivotal 218-participant trial gave reasonably narrow intervals for 6MWT (-18.7 to 12.3 m) and fatigue (-0.1 to 0.26). The small trials were imprecise, with intervals crossing zero or no interval reported, but they add little weight relative to the main trial.
Publication biasNot detectedBoth null and positive trials from the same development program are published. Selective reporting within trials (secondary endpoints without data, post hoc subgroups) is handled under risk of bias rather than here.

Included studies

Version 1 · published November 8, 2026 · evidence through November 8, 2026 · research snapshot 2026.1.1 · methodology ev-1 · GRADE (handbook, 2013) · Automated assessment by AI (claude-opus-5-5 and claude-sonnet-5-5), not reviewed by a person.

The questions and the studies screened

Population, intervention, comparator and outcome (PICO), and why each study was or wasn’t eligible.

Population: Adults with primary mitochondrial myopathy · Intervention: Elamipretide (SS-31) · Comparator: Placebo · Outcome: Six-minute walk distance and fatigue

  • PLS-00036: not eligible (not primary study)
  • PLS-00097: not eligible (wrong population)
  • PLS-00098: not eligible (wrong outcome)
  • PLS-00099: not eligible (wrong population)
  • PLS-00100: eligible · direct evidence: Randomized placebo-controlled trial of elamipretide in adults with PMM reporting six-minute walk test results overall and by genotype subgroup.
  • PLS-00101: not eligible (wrong population)
  • PLS-00102: not eligible (wrong population)
  • PLS-00103: not eligible (wrong population)
  • PLS-00104: not eligible (wrong population)
  • PLS-00105: not eligible (wrong population)
  • PLS-00106: not eligible (wrong population)
  • PLS-00107: eligible · direct evidence: The trial is a placebo-controlled RCT of elamipretide in adults with primary mitochondrial myopathy, with 6MWT and fatigue as primary endpoints.
  • PLS-00108: not eligible (wrong population)
  • PLS-00109: not eligible (wrong population)
  • PLS-00110: not eligible (wrong population)
  • PLS-00111: eligible · direct evidence: A placebo-controlled RCT of elamipretide in adults with primary mitochondrial myopathy, with 6MWT distance as the primary outcome and participant-reported symptoms also assessed.
  • PLS-00112: not eligible (wrong population)
  • PLS-00113: not eligible (wrong population)
  • PLS-00114: not eligible (wrong population)
  • PLS-00115: not eligible (wrong population)
  • PLS-00116: eligible · direct evidence: This randomized placebo-controlled trial in adults with primary mitochondrial myopathy reports 6MWT distance and fatigue outcomes for elamipretide.
  • PLS-00117: not eligible (wrong population)
  • PLS-00118: not eligible (wrong population)
  • PLS-00119: not eligible (not primary study)
  • PLS-00120: not eligible (wrong population)
  • PLS-00121: not eligible (wrong population)
  • PLS-00122: not eligible (wrong population)
  • PLS-00123: not eligible (wrong population)
  • PLS-00124: not eligible (wrong population)
  • PLS-00125: not eligible (wrong population)
  • PLS-00213: not eligible (wrong population)
  • PLS-00216: not eligible (wrong population)
  • PLS-00217: not eligible (wrong population)
  • PLS-00218: not eligible (wrong population)
  • PLS-00219: not eligible (wrong population)
  • PLS-00220: not eligible (wrong population)
  • PLS-00221: not eligible (wrong population)
  • PLS-00222: not eligible (insufficient data)
  • PLS-00223: not eligible (not primary study)
  • PLS-00224: not eligible (wrong population)
  • PLS-00228: not eligible (wrong population)
  • PLS-00229: not eligible (wrong population)
  • PLS-00230: not eligible (wrong population)
  • PLS-00231: not eligible (insufficient data)
  • PLS-00232: not eligible (wrong population)
  • PLS-00233: not eligible (wrong population)
  • PLS-00234: not eligible (wrong population)
  • PLS-00236: not eligible (wrong outcome)
  • PLS-00240: not eligible (insufficient data)
  • PLS-00241: not eligible (insufficient data)
  • PLS-00242: not eligible (wrong population)
  • PLS-00244: not eligible (wrong population)
  • PLS-00245: not eligible (wrong population)
  • PLS-00250: not eligible (wrong population)

Version history

  • Version 1 · published November 8, 2026 · evidence through November 8, 2026 · research snapshot 2026.1.1 · methodology ev-1 · Automated by rule (no eligible human study was found), not reviewed by a person.

How claims are assessed

These assessments describe published research. Records marked automated were produced by AI under the published methodology and have not been reviewed by a person; they can contain errors. None of this is medical advice, not a statement about any product’s safety for human use, and not a regulatory approval. Peptide Library’s vendor and partner relationships play no part in them (editorial independence).