which compound is actually the best documented, as a starting point
rather than starting with whatever is most talked about, id rather start with whatever has the most solid evidence behind it and work outwards. what would that be
rather than starting with whatever is most talked about, id rather start with whatever has the most solid evidence behind it and work outwards. what would that be
Sensible approach. Sorting by evidence rather than discussion volume you'd start with the approved ones: semaglutide, tirzepatide, tesamorelin, afamelanotide. Side effect is you'll notice how different those literatures feel. It calibrates you.
5 upvotes
hadnt thought of reading them as a reference standard
2 upvotes
start with the boring approved ones. makes sense
2 upvotes
Reading one full phase 3 program gives you a sense of what a complete package looks like, which makes the gaps elsewhere obvious rather than abstract.
3 upvotes
Join the discussion — reply to this thread or start your own.
Open in Community Q&ACommunity discussions are educational and cover published research. Nothing here is individualised medical advice. Community guidelines