klow vs glow, is the blend thing even a real comparison?
Glow is generally GHK-Cu / BPC-157 / TB-500. KLOW is the same plus KPV.
So the difference is one component. But the thing that actually bugs me is the structural problem with blends in general.
If someone reports anything from a four component blend, you cannot attribute it to any single component. You also can't attribute it to the combination specifically, because you'd need the components separately as comparators.
Which means blend reports are, evidence wise, close to uninterpretable. Fine as a starting point for a question, useless for a conclusion about ingredients.
This seems obvious written down and yet blends get discussed like single compounds constantly. Am I being too harsh? There's presumably an argument for them that isn't just convenience.